A review into the structure of the shire boundaries and wards proposed two main options: keeping the current ward-based divisions with minor boundary adjustments (option A) or an un-subdivided model of nine councillors (option B).
In a preliminary report filed in the past month the VEC said the current electoral structure continues to be the most effective method of representation for districts in Campaspe Shire.“Uneven population growth in the shire has necessitated adjustments in the present electoral structure,” the report said.
As part of its research, the VEC considered a variation of the current electoral structure that combines Rochester and Waranga wards to accommodate the declining number of voters in Waranga ward.
Additionally, a variation that built on the above model by also combining Echuca and Western wards was considered to do away with all single-councillor wards.
The VEC found forming an un-subdivided council would overcome population and boundary adjustment issues as well as uncontested candidates, however could affect the ‘distinct identity’ of towns in the district.
Campaspe Shire chief executive Ray Burton said council supported Option A, which retained the current structure of nine councillors across two three-councillor wards and three single-councillor wards.
“Council considers the current ward-based structure as the most appropriate and effective model to ensure voter representation for the diverse communities of interest across the shire,” he said.
“Campaspe Shire continues to experience population growth, particularly within the multi-member wards of Echuca and Kyabram-Deakin.
“Overall the council is satisfied with the findings and supports the VEC's preferred option.”The preliminary report received seven responses, with the majority in support of option A.
That was echoed by members of the Kyvalley community, who said in a submission that the option B would disadvantage small communities.
"Kyvalley would be disadvantaged when it comes to shire support for the facilities and activities of this active and dynamic but small district," it said.
The Kyabram Deakin Residents and Ratepayers Development Group also aired concerns for small communities.
"KDRRADG considers that option B where Campaspe shire council consist of nine councillors elected from an unsubdivided electoral structure would most probably result in a slow death to communities outside Echuca," it said.
"When debating and voting all councillors should be considering the overall benefits for Campaspe Shire, however councillors within the Echuca Ward are mainly involved in tourism, (with the focus on Echuca-Moama) and the Port of Echuca, orbusiness."We are of the opinion that without separate wards. Campaspe would become even more Echuca centric as a majority of Echuca candidates would stand for election."
